.

.

Tenth Amendment Center: My Debate Analysis

...from Tenth Amendment Center

Here’s my analysis of the first Trump-Biden presidential debate.

#constitution. @mmaharrey10th pic.twitter.com/qb8RJxP4qw

— TenthAmendmentCenter (@TenthAmendment) September 30, 2020

It was a train wreck

And almost nothing they talked about constitutionally has anything to do with the presidency.

In fact, most of the issues they talked about aren’t even in the purview of the federal government.

The founding generation never imaging the U.S. would eventually be ruled by an elected king.

For Further Reading

Executive Power: Who Made Presidents and Governors Kings?

The American President: A Modern King

Top 3 Ways Presidents Violate the Constitution

The post My Debate Analysis first appeared on Tenth Amendment Center Blog.


Mike Maharrey
September 30, 2020 at 04:15PM

Popular posts from this blog

Tenth Amendment Center: Was Justice Scalia an Old Originalist?

Image
...from Tenth Amendment Center One of the standard distinctions these days is between the old originalism and new originalism.  While different people define the distinction a little bit differently, I define the old originalism as having two essential characteristics: using “original intent” to determine the original meaning of a provision and a belief that significantly constraining judges is essential to the task of originalism. The newer originalisms – I use the term “newer originalisms” rather than the “new originalism” because new versions of originalism differ from one another – have abandoned these two characteristics.  The newer originalisms tend to focus on the original public meaning – focusing on a more textual than intentionalist approach.  And the newer originalisms no longer hold (or act like) significantly constraining judges is essential.  If the original meaning is permissive – if it is unclear, vague, or delegates power to judges – then that is the original meanin
Read more

Tenth Amendment Center: Thomas Jefferson’s Vision: Top-15 Quotes on the Constitution and Liberty

Image
...from Tenth Amendment Center From the foundation of the Constitution – to foundational principles of liberty – and even some strategy to support and advance both – the top-15 quotes from the Sage of Monticello. Path to Liberty, Fast Friday Edition: October 30, 2020 Subscribe: Apple | Spotify | Podbean | Google | Stitcher | TuneIn | RSS | More Platforms Here SHOW LINKS: JOIN TAC Show Archives Foundational Principles Free People – Summary View Rights of British America (1774) Elective Despotism – Notes on the State of Virginia (1784) Party – Letter to Francis Hopkinson (13 Mar 1789) Tyrant’s Will – Letter to Issac H. Tiffany (4 Apr 1819) Aggression – Letter to Francis Gilmer (7 Jun 1816) Constitutional structure Foundation (15 Feb 1791) True theory – Letter to Gideon Granger (13 Aug 1800) Exclusive or Final Judge & Whensoever (1798) Warnings What has Destroyed Liberty – Letter to Joseph C. Cabell (2 Feb 1816) Oligarchy – Letter to Charles Jarvis (28 Sep
Read more

Tenth Amendment Center: Permission not Required: “Constitutional Carry” Bill Introduced in South Dakota

Image
...from Tenth Amendment Center PIERRE , S.D. (Jan. 11, 2019) – A “Constitutional Carry” bill introduced in the South Dakota House would make it legal to carry a firearm without a license in the state, fostering an environment hostile to federal gun control. Sen. Lance Russell (R-Hot Springs) introduced Senate Bill 38 ( SB38 ) on Jan. 6, with eight cosponsors from both chambers. The bill seeks to repeal numerous sections of state law requiring state residents to have a license in order to carry a concealed weapon, while still allowing county sheriffs to issue permits. Under current state law , residents are required to have a conceal carry license to have a weapon in their vehicle. Former Gov. Dennis Daugaard rejected similar measures in the past, but with the election of Kristi Noem, supporters hope the legislation can be signed into law this time around. Gun shop owner Brandon Maddox told news station KSFY that a concealed carry permit is redundant. “I think that the second am
Read more